
Why the Supreme Court ruled against Trump's tariffs
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 5m 49sVideo has Closed Captions
Why the Supreme Court ruled against Trump's tariffs
The Supreme Court struck down most of President Trump's tariffs in a blow to his agenda. In a 6-3 decision, the court ruled that he did not have the authority under an economic emergency law to issue such levies. The president responded, saying he would impose a global 10% tariff under a different law. Geoff Bennett spoke with News Hour Supreme Court analyst and SCOTUSBlog co-founder Amy Howe.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Major corporate funding for the PBS News Hour is provided by BDO, BNSF, Consumer Cellular, American Cruise Lines, and Raymond James. Funding for the PBS NewsHour Weekend is provided by...

Why the Supreme Court ruled against Trump's tariffs
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 5m 49sVideo has Closed Captions
The Supreme Court struck down most of President Trump's tariffs in a blow to his agenda. In a 6-3 decision, the court ruled that he did not have the authority under an economic emergency law to issue such levies. The president responded, saying he would impose a global 10% tariff under a different law. Geoff Bennett spoke with News Hour Supreme Court analyst and SCOTUSBlog co-founder Amy Howe.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch PBS News Hour
PBS News Hour is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorshipAMNA NAWAZ: Welcome to the "News Hour."
The Supreme Court struck down most# of President Trump's global tariffs## today in a 6-3 decision that is a# major blow to his economic agenda.
GEOFF BENNETT: The court ruled that# President Trump did not have the## authority under a 1977 economic emergency# law to issue such sweeping tariffs.
The president responded forcefully,# using sharp language to criticize the## justices who ruled against him, calling them# unpatriotic and disloyal to the Constitution.## At a press conference, he said# he would move forward regardless,## vowing to impose a global 10 percent# across-the-board tariff under a different law.
DONALD TRUMP, President of the United# States: The Supreme Court's ruling on## tariffs is deeply disappointing.
And I'm# ashamed of certain members of the court,## absolutely ashamed for not having the# courage to do what's right for our country.
The Democrats on the court are thrilled, but# they will automatically vote no.
They're against## anything that makes America strong, healthy,# and great again.
They also are a, frankly,## disgrace to our nation.
Although I firmly disagree# with the court's holding today, the decision might## not substantially constrain a president's# ability to order tariffs going forward.
That's because numerous other federal statutes,## which is so true, authorize the president# to impose tariffs and might justify most,## if not all, of the tariffs issued in# this case, even more tariffs actually.
GEOFF BENNETT: And we start our# coverage tonight with the "News## Hour"'s Supreme Court analyst and# SCOTUSblog co-founder, Amy Howe.
Amy, it's always good to see you.
I want to read part of the chief justice's opinion# in this case w.. decision to impose the tariffs.
He says in part --# quote -- "The president asserts the extraordinary## power to unilaterally impose tariffs.
In light of# the breadth, history, and constitutional context## of that asserted authority, he must identify# clear congressional authorization to exercise it."
So what are your key takeaways from today's ruling# and this rebuke of the president's approach?
AMY HOWE: So this ruling didn't# come as much of a surprise.
After the oral argument, it seemed like# the Supreme Court was likely to strike## down the tariffs.
The real question was# how many justices would join to strike## the tariffs down and would they be able# to coalesce around a particular rationale?
I think probably from the justices'# perspective it's not a personal rebuke,## as much as it's a legal rebuke.
Under the# court's precedent for the president to## exercise this kind of sweeping power, they're# saying Congress needs to be really clear## before it hands over that power.
And they're# saying, we just don't see it here this time.
GEOFF BENNETT: Well, the president, as we# saw in that press briefing, he attacked the## justices personally and he also criticized# the way they wrote the decision, saying they## invalidated the tariffs, but didn't clarify what# should happen to the revenue already collected.
DONALD TRUMP: I said, well, what happens to all# the money that we took in?
It wasn't discussed.## Wouldn't you think they would have put one# sentence in there saying that keep the money## or don't keep the money, right?
I guess it# has to get litigated for the next two years.
So they write this terrible,# defective decision, totally defective.
GEOFF BENNETT: So, what do you make of that?
And earlier this evening, you# have the governor of Illinoi.. J.B.
Pritzker, demanding a $1,700 refund# per family for the people of his state.
AMY HOWE: The only real reference to it is in## Justice Brett Kavanaugh's opinion# for the three dissenting justices.
The lack of reference to the refunds# is complicated by the fact that the## litigants who were actually before# the Supreme Court in these cases had## been promised immediate refunds by the# federal government if they prevailed,## and it wasn't actually part of the# question before the Supreme Court.
The only question before the Supreme# Court was, does this federal law,## the International Emergency Economic Powers Act,## authorize the tariffs that the president# imposed?
Could the Supreme Court have said## something about the refunds?
Maybe, but it wasn't# entirely surprising that they didn't do it.
GEOFF BENNETT: The way the president attacked# the justices, what does that reveal about## the relationship between the president# and the Supreme Court in this moment?
AMY HOWE: Well, in this moment, clearly, it's not# good.
The Trump administration, particularly on## the court's emergency docket, had been on a# long winning streak in the Supreme Court for## basically all of 2025.
There was something like# 24 straight victories on the emergency docket.
The Trump administration is likely to# prevail in some other important cases## involving executive power, including# the question of whether or not the## president has the power to fire the heads# of independent agencies like the Federal## Trade Commission and the Consumer Product# Safety Commission for any reason at all.
In the past, he has referred to the justices that# he has appointed as my justices.
And so he feels,## I think, betrayed by Justice Neil# Gorsuch and Justice Amy Coney Barrett,## who were in the majority# today and who he appointed.
So I think he feels like the Supreme Court# possibly is there to rubber-stamp his policies,## and, with Justice Barrett and Justice# Gorsuch, perhaps a bit transactional,## that they are there because he appointed# him and they should support him.
GEOFF BENNETT: Amy Howe, thanks,# as always, for your analysis.
AMY HOWE: Thank you.
Brooks and Capehart on tariff ruling and Trump's attacks
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 9m 47s | Brooks and Capehart on the tariff ruling and Trump's attacks on Supreme Court justices (9m 47s)
Business owner who challenged tariffs responds to ruling
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 4m 32s | Business owner who challenged Trump's tariffs reacts to Supreme Court decision (4m 32s)
EPA rollbacks could raise health care costs, advocates warn
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 5m 31s | EPA rollbacks on pollution limits could drive up health care costs, advocates warn (5m 31s)
News Wrap: Ex-prince's former home searched after arrest
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 7m 2s | News Wrap: Ex-prince's former home searched a day after his arrest (7m 2s)
Palestinians in Gaza observe Ramadan amid destruction
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 3m 31s | Palestinians in Gaza observe Ramadan despite enormous destruction and loss (3m 31s)
Trump suggests limited strikes to push Iran to nuclear deal
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 4m 4s | Trump suggests limited strikes to push Iran to nuclear deal (4m 4s)
What's next for consumers after Supreme Court tariff ruling
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 5m 17s | What's next for consumers and the economy after the Supreme Court's tariff ruling (5m 17s)
Wyoming Gov. Gordon on tariffs, energy and the environment
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 2/20/2026 | 6m 30s | Wyoming Gov. Gordon on tariffs, energy and environmental stewardship (6m 30s)
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorship
- News and Public Affairs

FRONTLINE is investigative journalism that questions, explains and changes our world.

- News and Public Affairs

Amanpour and Company features conversations with leaders and decision makers.












Support for PBS provided by:
Major corporate funding for the PBS News Hour is provided by BDO, BNSF, Consumer Cellular, American Cruise Lines, and Raymond James. Funding for the PBS NewsHour Weekend is provided by...







